Zyklon B: Not an efficient way to kill people.

Hello and welcome back to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. I'm your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Well, I'm glad to report to you that the International Holocaust Revisionist Conference that took place at the William L. Pierce Memorial Hall in Hillsboro, West Virginia last weekend was a huge success. The featured speakers were excellent, and the down-home West Virginia cooking was outstanding. It was a great time of learning and socializing both, as the Conference participants had time to mingle and get to know one another between the various speeches. It was truly a remarkable event, and everyone who attended the Conference went home happy and thought that the Conference was well worth the cost associated with attending. We'll have to keep these ideas in mind for perhaps another such conference in the future.

Anyway, what I'd like to talk about today is the Jewish media's use of the term "denier" to assign a negative label to anyone who questions the official version of the Holocaust story, whatever his political goals or his ideological leanings. One doesn't have to be a firmly-committed racialist like I am to be labeled a "denier" by the Jewish media. All one has to do is to commit the unforgivable sin of refusing to believe that six million Jews were willfully exterminated by the German National Socialists in an ethnic-cleansing program of gargantuan proportions. If you do that and go public about it, it doesn't matter if you're the most Left-leaning, diversity-minded hippie tree-hugger on the planet; you're going to be lumped with all of the other nasty people out there who the media have labeled as "deniers." And then there will always be following you the hidden suspicion that you are also one of those hateful people who either actively support or passively cheer for the vanguard of the White race, and -- according to the media Jews -- the enemy of all things Jewish, and that is the White Racialist Cause.

Now, let's clear up a few things. Firstly, those who doubt the official version of the Holocaust story aren't always White racialists. Granted, some of them are -- in fact, virtually all White racialists qualify for "denier" status according to the Jewish media's criteria for membership -- but subscribing to the ideology of White racialism is not a prerequisite for being a "denier." Take, for example, the perhaps millions of Iranians who -- thanks to the progressive leadership of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad -- are probably some of the biggest doubters of the official version of the Holocaust anywhere in the world, and no one would accuse them of being White racialists. But to the Jewish establishment, one is an enemy if one is a White racialist, and one is an enemy if one doubts the official version of the Holocaust. If one falls into both categories, maybe the Jews consider him to be a "super enemy," I don't know.

Secondly, Holocaust "deniers" in general -- and White racialists in particular -- aren't necessarily enemies of all things Jewish. This might be a good time to refresh everyone's memory -- not only our own, but also the memory of the enemy -- that AT ROOT the White Racialist Cause, which is led in the Western Hemisphere by the National Alliance, doesn't care a whit about the Jews. We are concerned only with our own people -- their numbers, their quality, their culture, their safety, and their biological progress -- and what happens to the Jews right now isn't even on our radar.

The only interest we have in the Jews is to get them off our backs. In our estimation, they have weaseled their way into our culture and our civilization -- initially through the business world, and later through the media and government -- to the point that, we believe, they have so warped our culture that it no longer resembles a culture that the White race would produce, or even COULD produce.

And so, to that extent, we want the Jews out, because we think that they are wrecking our culture. We think that, with their guidance, our society has reached the point at which our people's racial integrity is no longer assured; that, through high non-White birthrates, high rates of both legal and illegal non-White immigration, and the high rate of racial mixing between Whites and non-Whites, that our gene pool is threatened. We believe that the Jews have effectively managed this bastardization of what used to be a White, Western civilization in the New World, and therefore we want them out. No matter what the cost or how long it takes to get the job done, we want them out. What happens to them at that point, we don't care.

So we aren't interested in the Jews as such, except for when it comes to stopping them from sucking out the lifeblood of our people. If that would end today by the Jews voluntarily releasing what looks like a death-grip on us, then our quarrel with them would be over and both races could go their merry and separate ways.

But the Jews won't let go willingly, and so it is our responsibility as White men and women of honor to wage whatever battle we can against that established power, by whatever means we have at our disposal. And one of those means is by exposing the fallacies, half-truths, and downright lies of the official version of the Holocaust story.

And one other thing about Holocaust "denial." It is incorrect to state -- as the Jewish media so often do -- that Holocaust "deniers" say the Holocaust never happened. Such a statement suggests that Holocaust "deniers" believe that there were no concentration camps and no crematoria. That isn't the case. Of course Holocaust "deniers" believe that there were concentration camps and crematoria, and they also believe many other things that are mentioned in the official Holocaust story, such as trainloads of prisoners, crowded barracks, mass graves (especially near the end of the war), and gas chambers. But what Holocaust "deniers" DO deny is that all of these things were simply checkpoint items on the master list of how to exterminate European Jewry. They weren't.

And THAT is the rub here. Holocaust "deniers" claim -- with good reason -- that not only did the German National Socialists NOT try to exterminate the Jewish people, there was not even a plan to do so. The PLAN was to remove the Jews from German living space, and that is exactly what happened.

I'm not going to go into a point-by-point analysis of the "denier's" version of what happened in the Holocaust, except to mention a few points that most people who are even remotely familiar with the official story can understand. Suffice it to say that there are countless more details about inconsistencies -- some people would call them barefaced lies -- in the official version of the story, but I'll let you find out all of that on your own, if you're interested. There are many fine books on the subject of what "deniers" believe, and you can bet that those books can't be found on the shelf at Barnes and Noble or Waldenbooks. Thankfully, they can quite easily be found on the Internet for those who are brave enough to look, or from our book company, National Vanguard Books.

So here is the quick-and-easy guide to Holocaust denial...

Yes, there were gas chambers, but they were not used for killing human beings. They were used to de-louse clothing. Killing large numbers of human beings with gas brings with it many problems, the first of which is that it would pose a serious hazard to the workers responsible for carrying out the alleged killings. As the bodies fell onto one another, toxic gas would become trapped in the spaces between the bodies and would only be freed when the bodies are moved to make room for the next batch. Gas masks and perhaps full-body chemical suits would be needed for the cleanup job.

Not to mention that trying to clear out an entire roomful of collapsed bodies is no easy task. Each body would have to be individually moved and then -- according to the legend -- almost all of these were individually cremated. The official Holocaust storytellers want us to believe that roughly six million Jews were gassed, and then each one moved and then cremated, a combustion process that takes, as I recall, several hours per body. It doesn't add up. It's a lie.

That's not how I imagine the Germans would set about killing millions of people. Remember, this is the branch of the White race that is lauded by the world for its efficiency and "can-do" attitude. Even German-haters like Jews acknowledge this fact. Indeed, Germany's rise to economic power after both of the two world wars is evidence that hard work, ingenuity, and achievement are hallmarks of the German mentality.

So, instead of wasting so much effort and time by killing people by the means described in the official version of the Holocaust tale, why not modify some dump trucks with sealed cargo areas? Herd the prisoners in, seal it up, gas them, and then drive the truck to a giant open pit, and dump. In fact, after loading them up, drive and gas them at the same time to maximize your efficiency. Use backhoes and steam-shovels to dig huge pits and cover the bodies with dirt. Drive back and forth all day. Highly efficient and no mess.

Perhaps they didn't have dump trucks in those days that could have done such a thing. But that's not my point. My point is that, if killing Jews and others was the ultimate goal, there is NO WAY that the Germans would have chosen such an inefficient and labor-intensive process as herding Jews into rooms and gassing them, only to have to drag bodies out of the room, transport them to the crematoria, and turn them into ash. Far more effective would have been the method used most often by Stalin for purging the Soviet Union of all of those Russians who weren't overly enthusiastic about communism and the seizure of private property by the state: firing squads. The Germans would have been able to kill six million Jews much more easily that way, if they had REALLY wanted to kill Jews.

But they didn't choose that way. Instead, they chose gas. And the reason they chose gas was because that WAS the most efficient way to kill what they DID set out to kill: disease-spreading lice which, I might add, cannot be efficiently killed by firing squads.

That's just one example of the endless number of absurd claims that can be found in the official version of the Holocaust story. It is for reasons like this that "deniers" deny the Holocaust... as described by Jewish media sources. Other "denier" books and articles -- that is, revisionist books and articles -- dissect the official version of the story piece by piece. For instance, the fact that Germany was at war against almost the entire world -- and, by 1944, was clearly losing that war as evidenced by its retreat on all fronts and the nightly bombings of every major German city and industrial complex -- that fact clearly explains why there were food shortages at the camps and why the typhus epidemics weren't able to be handled as readily as they might have been.

And the official Holocaust hoaxsters have never adequately explained WHY, if the Germans were out to exterminate the Jews, there were any Jews still alive when the camps were "liberated" by the Allies. Just from a common-sense standpoint, if one's purpose were to kill as many Jews as possible and one knew that one had to abandon the inmate camp because the Americans or the Soviets were about to arrive, then why would there be any Jews left alive for the Allies to liberate? Why were there so many survivors, if the whole point was to kill them?

Anyway, a prime example of someone who made an objective analysis of all of the facts available on the so-called "Holocaust" and then had the integrity to stand behind his conclusions regarding those facts is Dr. Arthur Butz, a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois. After compiling the information available -- much of it technical information that his formal education allowed him to sift through -- Dr. Butz published in 1976 a book that was a vanguard work of "deniers" everywhere, and has remained so for more than 30 years. That book is entitled Hoax of the 20th Century, and it has been lambasted by official Holohoaxsters ever since.

Often, in reviews of the book written by official sources, writers claim that the book appears legitimate, written in an academic style, but that upon closer examination, all of Dr. Butz's arguments are seen to be flawed. However, those writers never elaborate on exactly WHAT those flawed arguments are. I believe that the reason for that lack of specifics is that there aren't any flawed arguments in Butz's work. It is an objective appraisal of what is the most likely explanation as to what happened in the German concentration camps during the Second World War. And Dr. Butz concludes that it is MOST UNLIKELY that the Germans killed or even tried to kill six million Jews.

To my knowledge, Arthur Butz has never been a member of a racialist organization like the National Alliance. But that hasn't stopped the Jewish Establishment from doing all sorts of nasty things to him. They've tried to get him fired from his position as a professor at Northwestern. He's been subjected to all sorts of pressure from student groups demanding that he resign. He's been harassed for three decades NOT for being an outspoken racialist and advocate for the White race, but merely for sharing the unpopular facts that he discovered about the so-called "Holocaust" with others. Administrators at Northwestern wring their hands in agony every time they have to explain to student groups that they can't fire Dr. Butz because, first of all, he is a tenured faculty member, and secondly, firing him would violate the university's commitment to academic freedom, no matter how "unsavory."

Well, Dr. Arthur Butz was the featured speaker at this past weekend's International Holocaust Revisionist Conference, and he was outstanding. His arguments laid to rest any remaining doubts that Conference attendees may have yet held prior to last weekend. If you are REALLY interested in the truth, then you owe it to yourself to check out the facts and ideas presented by Arthur Butz and the many other excellent revisionist historians, the "deniers" out there who -- like true scientists -- take the facts as they stand and draw the most likely conclusions from those facts.

These "deniers" don't care too much for what someone said about the Holocaust or what someone said someone said about what happened during the Holocaust, they look for the available evidence. "Eyewitness" accounts, long offered up to the unsuspecting public as "proof" that the Holocaust did in fact occur, are the weakest form of "evidence" in any courtroom. Similarly, confessions extracted from German prisoners under threat of torture -- or, in many cases, actual use of torture -- are equally weak arguments.

Basically, it boils down to this: The only hard evidence that Holocaust proponents use to back their claims of the planned extermination of six million Jews -- gas chambers, crematoria, a limited number of mass graves -- have very simple explanations: lice, natural death of inmates, and typhus epidemics. All the other so-called "evidence" is based on eyewitness accounts and confessions, which -- as we have seen -- is NOT evidence.

The Holocaust story as it is told to the world is a lie, and we need to reveal it as such, not just because we are concerned about historical truth, but also because revealing that lie will weaken the Jewish stranglehold on our people and give us a better chance to achieve our White homeland.

We've been speaking in this broadcast about "deniers," and we've been using that term to refer to those who question the official version of the Holocaust story. But I'd like to take that term out of quotes now, and let's see if we can identify who the real deniers are.

The deniers are those who are denying the right of our people to exist on this planet. The deniers are those who, every single day with their media, are denying the truth about our race's dismal plight on a worldwide scale. The deniers are those who are denying that they have any animosity toward our people, denying that they use their financial, media, and governmental power to hold our race down and drain its lifeblood. The deniers are those who are denying the truth about the so-called "Holocaust," and who are denying that they use the "Holocaust" as a weapon to morally disarm our people and to gather the wealth of White nations.

The Jews are the master deniers. And if they would quit denying that the best thing for everyone would be for the races to separate, we'd all be a lot better off.

I guess the best remedy for a denier is to rub his face in the truth. That's what we're trying to do in getting the word out about what really happened in the inmate camps during the Second World War.

We're not out to start another Holocaust. We just want to make sure that everyone knows that there wasn't even a first one, so that we can distance the White race from every other race and get back to the business of racial progress and culture.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.