Bobby Cutts Jr., Jessie Davis, Nikki Giavasis, and Myisha Ferrell

Hello and welcome back to this week's broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. I'm your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Unless you've been living under a rock, you probably have heard about the case of Jessie Davis, the 26-year-old White woman from Canton, Ohio, whose partially-decomposed body was found this past week in a remote and wooded region of Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Davis's body still held the fetus -- already named Chloe -- that she had carried for nearly nine months, and which was due to be born this coming week on July 3rd.

Davis had been missing since June 14th, and a massive search of more than a week that enlisted the services of thousands of volunteers from all over the country finally yielded results, although unfortunately not the results that everyone was hoping for. It was clear that Davis and the unborn Chloe had been murdered, although due to the advanced state of decomposition of the corpses, the exact cause of death may not be known for a couple of weeks, when autopsy and DNA evidence are fully compiled.

To date, the key suspect in the case is 30-year-old Black male, Bobby Cutts Jr. Cutts is Davis's boyfriend and a Canton police officer. He is the father of Davis's first child -- a two-year-old -- and is believed to be the father of the murdered Chloe. Cutts has a rather interesting history; I'll just summarize briefly for you what has come out in the news.

About ten years ago, Cutts had a year-long relationship with now-Hollywood actress and model, Nikki Giavasis, and fathered a daughter with her in 1997. The relationship ended soon after and, in 1998, Cutts pleaded no contest to trespassing after forcing his way into the duplex where Giavasis was together with then-Cleveland Cavaliers Black basketball star, Shawn Kemp. Despite this run-in with the law and his reputation for physical and verbal abuse, Cutts was hired on to the Canton police force in 2000. In 2001, Cutts married a White woman, Kelly Schaub, to whom he is still married but is estranged.

Then began the real trouble. Cutts was fired from the Canton police force in 2003 when, after reporting his service pistol stolen, it later turned up in the possession of his cousin, a drug dealer. His superiors alleged that Cutts GAVE his cousin the gun, but Cutts complained about being singled out as a Black officer and was reinstated on the police force, pocketing back pay in the process.

Apparently, there wasn't enough evidence against Cutts to prosecute him with regard to the unusual circumstances surrounding his weapon back in 2003. Either that, or the Canton police department just didn't want to get itself involved in a racial discrimination lawsuit, which probably would have been a messy affair, and one that would have put the police department in a negative light before the public.

After all, isn't that what the media always do to police departments when it comes to racial issues? From "racial profiling" to demands for more non-Whites on the police force to the rare cases of non-Whites being beaten by frustrated cops who see every day, first-hand, the sickness and criminal plague that is rotting away our country... the media miss no opportunity to spatter police departments with their slime.

So the thinkers and analyzers in the Canton police department probably figured it would be easier to let Cutts off the hook and pretend that nothing happened. I wonder what they are thinking now. Certainly the members of the Davis family wish that Cutts would have been locked up before he had met Jessie, fathered two children with her, and then possibly killed her and their second child.

So today, Bobby Cutts Jr. has been charged with two counts of murder, one for the killing of Jessie Davis and one for their nearly-born-but-not-quite child, Chloe. Although little evidence has been available in the case to date, it is known that police found toppled furniture in Davis's apartment, as well as bleach spilled on the floor. I doubt there are any statistics as to what fraction of the public knows that bleach can destroy DNA evidence but, as a police officer, Bobby Cutts Jr. certainly knew that.

Anyway, in recent days, a possible accomplice to the crime, 29-year-old Black female Myisha Ferrell -- a former classmate of Cutts -- has also been identified and has been charged with obstruction of justice. As I said before, if you've been keeping up with the case, you are already familiar with these facts, and of course more facts might have surfaced by the time you hear this broadcast.

So what are we White racialists to make of this whole nasty business with Jessie Davis and her Black, married-to-another-White-woman boyfriend?

Firstly, it is interesting to note that NOT ONE PEEP has come from the media about the racial aspect of the Jessie Davis murder. Sure, the photographs of Jessie Davis and Bobby Cutts Jr. have appeared on the TV screens and in the newspapers and on the Internet news sites -- and everybody knows the race of everyone involved in the case -- but nobody in the controlled news media world is harping on the racial aspect like they have in the past. Think of the media hoopla that surrounded the well-known beating of convicted robber, drunk driver, PCP user, speeder, and stoplight runner Rodney King by White Los Angeles police officers in 1991. Or of convicted Black drug dealer Michael James, who was shot to death by a drunken White man, James Burmeister, in Fayetteville, North Carolina in 1995. Or of James Byrd Jr. of Jasper, Texas, who was dragged to death behind a pickup truck driven by White men in 1998. Or of any number of other cases in which the defendants were White and the victims non-White.

I'm not condoning any of the behavior I just described; I'm simply making the point that the Jewish media choose to make very big deals out of White-on-non-White crime and much littler deals out of non-White-on-White crime. About the latter, there is an overabundance of such crimes, but most of it we never hear about. Sometimes it will make the local news -- often with the race of the criminal and the victim not mentioned -- but hardly ever will such a story make the national news. And if it does, you can be sure that only the barest and simplest facts will be presented: none of the demands for massive racial compensations and immediate government action that often accompany White-on-non-White crime stories.

So for the national Jewish media to be so meek and mild about the racial aspects of the Jessie Davis murder is not at all consistent with their response to similar tragedies involving non-White victims. Instead, we are fed big crowds of weepy Ohioans, such as the volunteers who searched many days for Davis's body. The national media show us handmade signs tacked onto trees: "God bless Jessie and Chloe," for example. This is all a far cry from the hatred and vilification called down upon our collective race from the media on the rare occasions when one of our people loses control and takes out his anger on a non-White.

While we're on this topic, here's an idea for any amateur investigative journalists out there: Why not put together a compilation (perhaps 40 of the most shocking cases) of non-White-on-White crimes that DIDN'T make the national news? A good place to get started would be our National Alliance Web site, which already contains various items that relate to this topic. But there have to be more such stories out there, most of them having probably been reported in local papers, but that are worthy of national attention to a racialist audience. If we put these all in one place, and made the collection available for free in PDF format on our Web site, maybe we could reach a few fence-sitters that we wouldn't otherwise reach. It's something to think about anyway.

So, back to Jessie Davis and the obvious conclusions that anyone who cares about his or her race should draw. As transparent a fact as this is, it is worth putting it out there for all to see: Don't get involved in a romantic relationship with a non-White. It's very simple: Don't do it. Whatever you need to do to convince your loved ones (especially your young ones) to steer clear of non-White "significant others," do it. Try reasoning with them, show them the facts, use scare tactics, whatever. Just get it through their heads, or they might regret it.

Although there aren't a lot of statistics available, the ones that are out there clearly point in favor of same-race romantic relationships.

Also, the readily-available online CDC and U.S. census data on HIV and AIDS tell the same story. In 2005, 31% of all new HIV/AIDS cases were Whites and 49% were Blacks. In that year, Whites made up a total of 75% of the U.S. population, while Blacks, comprised a mere 12% of the U.S. population. Let me state those numbers again: 75% of the population accounted for 31% of new HIV/AIDS cases in 2005, while 12% of the population accounted for 49%. And for the more sexually-active portion of the population -- those under the age of 25 -- the numbers are even worse: 61% of all new HIV/AIDS cases diagnosed between 2001 and 2004 were Blacks.

Those should be pretty frightening statistics for the parents of young Whites in America. So when White Kristi starts spending time with Black Tyrone, it isn't just her future happiness that might be at stake, it could also be her current health. And, I suppose -- as Jessie Davis found out -- it might even be her life.

Now, while we in the National Alliance are somewhat concerned about the health and happiness of individual Whites, those goals are subordinate to the greater goal of overall racial health and happiness. In other words, the welfare of the race itself overrides the welfare of any single individual or set of individuals. And it is from that point of view that I'm now going to address the Jessie Davis murder case.

There are millions of people in the United States who believe -- and here, I'm talking Whites as well as non-Whites -- who would never enter into a romantic relationship with someone of a different race, but who also see no problem with others doing so. They have no moral objection to interracial relationships, despite the fact that they themselves would never venture "outside the tribe."

These people think along these lines:

"Jessie Davis is an adult, and what she does with her personal life is her business. If she wants to sleep around with a married Black man, that's her business. If she wants to get pregnant multiple times by this Black man and rear mixed-race children, that's her business. It's not a lifestyle I would choose for myself, but it's her life."

Such people extend that shortsighted line of thinking to everyone else involved in a mixed-race relationship because they mistakenly believe that it is an unassailable position. And they stand very firm on this stance when it comes to mixed-race couples that are, by all outward appearances, happy together.

Most of those I've just described are well-meaning people. They aren't the perverted race-haters, the ones who get some sick enjoyment from seeing White men with Asian women or White women with Black men. The perverted race-haters are a small minority, and I'm not really interested in them.

But I AM interested in the well-meaning White mainstreamers, the fence-sitters, the people who are fine workers and fine citizens but who, as of yet, are lacking the toughness to make difficult decisions about such things as race. Even if those decisions can be shown to result in a long-term good, these folks shy away from them if they require a short-term discomfort for anyone. Usually, this inability to make tough decisions is due to an unfamiliarity with life's realities, as a consequence of our society's present abnormal state of separation from nature.

Some of these people, I believe, can be won over to Our Cause, and one way to do that is to address their perceptions about individual rights -- specifically, the supposed "right" for any man or woman to marry and have children with any other, regardless of race.

Essentially, the argument often used to justify interracial relationships -- "One can do whatever he wants to do, as long as he isn't bothering or hurting others" -- is a completely false notion. Furthermore, not only is it a FALSE notion, but we human beings routinely accept just the OPPOSITE as the way things HAVE to be. That is to say, it is an implicit feature of all human life that one CANNOT do whatever he wants to do, EVEN IF he isn't bothering or hurting others. And what I'm going to argue is that if one CAN'T do whatever he wants with regard to so many aspects of life, then why -- when it comes to interracial relationships -- do people think that a person CAN do what he wants? Let me give you a few examples, and we'll take a narrow-minded view, at first.

A person who grows marijuana in his basement and consumes it himself isn't hurting or bothering anyone else, but we all agree that such activity is criminal in nature. The same is true for anyone who makes his own "meth" for his sole consumption. We have laws against that, and as a society we subscribe to the underlying principle that one CANNOT do whatever he wants to do, EVEN IF he isn't bothering or hurting others.

Suppose someone wants to add a detached storage shed behind his house. He won't be defacing anyone else's property; he's just putting up a storage shed. He had better check his neighborhood covenant first, because some of them forbid such an outbuilding. Here again: "One CANNOT do whatever he wants to do, EVEN IF he isn't bothering or hurting others."

How about driving 90 miles per hour down a deserted interstate at three in the morning? In this case, as with the others, it doesn't matter that no one else is being bothered or hurt. "One CANNOT do whatever he wants to do, EVEN IF he isn't bothering or hurting others."

Now, for my critics out there, it is of course understood -- when looked at from a wider perspective -- that someone else IS being bothered or hurt in each of the above instances, or else someone else has the POTENTIAL of being bothered or hurt. For a drug addict, the family members and friends are affected; health insurance rates for the rest of us go up, and so on. Similarly, the whole neighborhood is affected if someone puts up an outbuilding. Exceeding the speed limit is a safety issue, not just for the driver of the speeding car, but also for any other drivers on the road.

So, it rarely applies in our society that "One can do whatever he wants to do, as long as he isn't bothering or hurting others." And yet people use this phony principle as an excuse to justify their passive stance on interracial relationships because it's a convenient way for them to avoid having to deal with the intermingling of the races in society, a problem that is getting worse and worse as the degree of mixing increases.

Almost all of our actions, no matter how personal they seem, will affect others. This fact is especially true for interracial relationships. Obviously, such relationships affect the individual participants and the immediate family members, but -- and this is most important -- they affect the integrity of the race, OUR RACE, the race that is living on the edge, without any reserves, as I mentioned last week.

And that means that the White genetic material that we have right now MUST be safeguarded and maintained. Eventually, if we in the National Alliance have our way, that genetic material will again go through a massive expansion phase, but right now we are just concerned about maintaining it.

All of this brings us back to the White Jessie Davis and her Black -- and possibly murdering -- boyfriend, who is already married to another White woman and who has undoubtedly had relationships with still other White women. And it brings us face to face with the many thousands of White/non-White interracial couples out there that most people don't concern themselves with because "As long as they aren't hurting anyone, they can do what they want."

Well, they ARE hurting something very important: the White race and our future on this planet. And we in the National Alliance are out to build a society in which it will be very well understood that interracial relationships destroy the integrity of the race, which is why there won't be any non-Whites in our living space at all. There'll be plenty of freedom to go around, but not any freedom that damages the physical or moral strength of our people.

The life of Jessie Davis would have had a much happier ending if our society understood and implemented the racial truths that we in the National Alliance wish to put into concrete form.

Why not consider helping us to do that?

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.