The next target?



Hello, and welcome to this week's edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of the National Alliance. I'm your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

You know, in the world of the popular mass media, you can't push the same old claptrap to the masses forever. You've got to constantly have new things for the herd to talk about and worry about or, if not entirely new things, then you've got to have stories that take a new angle on an old topic. Clearly, as should be obvious to anyone who pays attention to the mainstream media party line, there are certain types of news stories and certain ideas that never entirely go away, but these stories have to be cycled periodically so that those whom the late Dr. William Pierce referred to as lemmings don't get too satiated with one particular story.

There are many ideas in the American Jewish media that never completely go away. They might be given a break for a while, but one can be assured that, as certain as it is that the Sun will come out tomorrow, it won't be long before these stories will again be paraded before the public. Some examples of these stories and opinions are the following:

• the belief in the blameless nature of everything done by the state of Israel, and the belief in the essentially evil nature of everything done by any of the Arab entities in the Middle East, including especially the Palestinians

• the alleged rightness of multiracialism; in particular, racial inbreeding, but also racial mixing in every other forum imaginable: schools, neighborhoods, workplaces, churches, and community organizations

• the alleged evil of any form of White racial consciousness, as contrasted with any form of non-White racial consciousness (such as exclusively Jewish, Hispanic, or Black consciousness), which is portrayed by the media as being excusable and is even encouraged

• the alleged evil of any attempt by anyone to maintain the racial integrity of the White race, whether that be through opposition to immigration or anything else that is perceived to show some degree of preference for White people or White institutions or White traditions or White codes of behavior

With almost no exceptions, everything on television, in magazines and newspapers, on the radio, or in the music stores or movie theaters… all speak with one voice on such issues as I have mentioned above. Any voice that happens to be heard in the media that contradicts the Jewish party line is only presented by the media as a target for attack and derision; that is, the views of opponents of the Jews are only allowed to be seen in the Jewish media when the Jews can use that opposition as fuel to further their own agenda.

It isn't too much to say that the near-monopoly that the Jews have on the mass media, coupled with the fact that all of those media speak with one voice on every issue of importance to the White race, amounts to a program of brainwashing of the American public. Of course, the Jews intend for that brainwashing to have a noticeable effect on everyone, but they especially gear their propaganda toward those whose minds are keen enough to be able to grasp the significance of historical and current events. The masses are brainwashed enough with TV, with popular music, and with the movies. Those things, and plenty of spectator sports, tend to keep them right where the Jews want them to be. So it is the more educated and politically-astute Americans who are the targets for all of the high-sounding "analyses" and "political forums" that appear on news television and on Internet news sites. The Jews have made it appear to be "uncultured" and "uncivilized" to take a position counter to the one they have approved. And the events in the United States for the past century at least have borne out the essential effectiveness of their strategy.

Fortunately, with the Internet, the National Alliance and several other legitimate White racialist and truth-disseminating organizations have been able to circumvent the Jewish monopoly in the mass media and have been able to maintain not only connections with those who already share our values, but also make new connections with those who are potentially open to switching their allegiances from the current system based on money and self-service to our value system, which is based on blood and on serving the wider racial community.

This is why, ever since he founded the National Alliance in the 1970s, Dr. William Pierce made the building of a White media a top priority of the organization. We have several Internet outreach programs, book and music distribution efforts, as well as various periodicals that are targeted at specific elements of the White population. Our media efforts are by no means perfect or complete, and we will continue to try to improve and expand them, but there is no doubt that we should all agree on the importance of building and maintaining a voice through which we can speak to our beleaguered kinsmen the world over.

Anyway, the topic for today's broadcast centers on the latest target of the American Jewish media: Iran. Ever since the fall of Saddam Hussein and the devolution of Iraq into a tribal and fragmented war zone, the American Jewish media have been taking potshots at Iran and its gutsy and charismatic leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. We've discussed Ahmadinejad before on these broadcasts, especially with regard to his widely-publicized questioning of the official version of the so-called Holocaust. If you recall, Ahmadinejad prompted and hosted the first International Holocaust Revisionist Conference in Tehran in December of last year, a topic that I mentioned in these broadcasts several times. I remember that in one broadcast we discussed certain excerpts from an interview that Ahmadinejad gave to the German magazine Der Spiegel.

In those past broadcasts, we talked specifically about the Iranian President and his views about some of the things that have been going on in the Middle East. But most of the time when I've had something to say about Iran on American Dissident Voices, I haven't made specific reference to its president. Most of the time, it has been a short segment within the context of a much larger issue dealing with Iraq or Israel or the Middle East in general, and in those segments I've issued some kind of warning, not only to the people of Iran but also to the White men and women of North America and Europe, that the Jews are working to get Iran into the crosshairs. Today, more than ever, I feel that that warning needs to be issued again, and issued very loudly and very clearly.

Any half-wit could have foreseen that, once the American military and the American taxpayers had served the Jews' immediate purpose of destroying Iraq so that Israel could breathe more easily in the Middle East, it was only a matter of time before the Jews would begin looking around the Middle East for someone else to worry about. And any half-wit could have foreseen that that "someone else" was most probably going to be the Islamic Republic of Iran, which is an explicitly Muslim state with a history of refusing to be bossed around by either Israel or Israel's bully boy, the United States.

So more than a year ago, the propaganda machine of the American Jewish media began to smear Iran and its leader with all of the same slime that they smear on anyone who doesn't willfully go along with the Jewish plan for destroying "non-Jewish Group A" with the funds, manpower, and military might of "non-Jewish Group B." That happened most noticeably during the Second World War, in which the non-Jewish Germans were destroyed by the non-Jewish Americans, British, and Russians. An enemy of the Jews was destroyed in Central Europe, and a regime that was extremely friendly to Jews -- namely, the Soviet Union -- was allowed to conquer and enslave much of eastern and southern Europe.

Only after the war -- during the late 1940s and early 1950s -- did the Soviet Union turn into a not-so-safe place for Jews, as Stalin began to view them as threats to his power and as possible collaborators with the Jewish-controlled West. His persecutions of the Jews during the last five years of his life had only begun before he conveniently died in March of 1953, just in time to prevent the next wave of Jewish arrests. It is believed that the so-called "Doctors' Plot" of early 1953 would have resulted in a large number of Soviet Jewish imprisonments and executions, and possibly even a massive Jewish emigration from the Soviet Union. One who looks at the events of history from a White racialist standpoint will always wonder whether some Jewish underhandedness was responsible for the "oh-so-convenient" death of Stalin at such a crucial moment in the history of the Jews in Russia. Certainly the Jews had a reason to bump him off, but probably we'll never know the truth.

Anyway, the slime-smearing Jewish media has been at work on Iran's President Ahmadinejad and the Islamic Republic for a few years now. It started with allegations by Jewish forces in Israel and the West that Iran was conducting nuclear research with the intent to build nuclear weapons. Iran has given mixed answers to that charge over the last couple of years, at times denying it completely and other times stating something to the effect that Iran will continue seeking ways to defend itself against any outside forces. The latter statements don't directly come out and say, "We're trying to develop nuclear weapons," but they don't deny it either.

Whether or not Iran is developing nuclear weapons is of no concern to me. Certainly, if I lived in Iran, I think I'd want the extra attack-deterring effect that a nuclear arsenal might offer, particularly since the enemy state of Israel already DOES have "The Bomb" and has shown that, in its historical dealings with the Arab nations surrounding it, it will do anything and everything to not only protect itself, but also to antagonize its neighbors.

But now consider the perspective of a high-ranking Israeli official, whom we'll address personally:

"Your nation, Israel, has been laughing and kicking dirt in the faces of the Palestinians and every surrounding Arab state for the last 60 years, doing everything in your power to build your nation up… and that includes such noble and character-building activities as fleecing the American taxpayers for economic and military aid, not to mention cajoling the spineless American politicians to back you EVERY SINGLE TIME in the sphere of international politics, no matter how reprehensible your nation's behavior.

"But, not only were you at work to build up Israel, you were also -- at the same time -- doing everything imaginable to hold down your neighbors. You've spied on them, hindered their economic development, and even carried out a few unprovoked bombings of their cities or military installations or power stations, if that suited your whim of the moment. You've gotten the United States to play the enforcer for you many times, as in the case of Saddam Hussein and Iraq, which saved you the trouble of sacrificing your own Jewish citizens' money and blood.

"Of course you're going to be uptight about Iran and its nuclear program, since you know that the Iranians hate your guts because of all the humiliation and abuse that you've heaped upon them over the years. So you and every other power-wielding Jew in the world decide that you're going to do something about it. And you do -- which, it pains me to say -- is a credit to you and your people because, after all, not everyone is willing to stand up and fight for the well-being of his race."

Having said our piece to a typical Israeli politician, we look back now and see that in almost every case, the Jewish assault starts with a slander campaign and with introducing to the masses -- over and over and over -- the barefaced lie that such-and-such a nation is a danger to the rest of the world. That's the tactic they used against Adolf Hitler and Germany in the late '30s and early '40s. That's the tactic they used against Saddam and Iraq only five or six years ago. That's the tactic they have used against any White racialist or racialist organization that is a legitimate threat to disturbing their carefully constructed house of cards. And that's the tactic they are using against Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the Islamic Republic of Iran today.

In an Associated Press article last week written by Adam Goldman -- whose name would suggest that he is a Jew -- Goldman describes Iran's President as being "eccentric," "defiant," and "unpredictable." Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton -- whose unforgettable pose in November of last year was caught on film, when he raised his hand to register the ONLY objection to the U.N. Security Council's resolution condemning Israel's attacks in Gaza (an objection which amounts to the U.S. vetoing the resolution) -- has shown how much he reveres the international organization he was an active part of by calling it a "Twilight Zone" and has likened Ahmadinejad to a "tinhorn dictator." Although this broadcast was prepared before Ahmadinejad's expected appearances at Columbia University and the U.N. during the week of September 24-28, I fully expect the negative publicity for the Iranian president to continue flowing without letup for some time.

Besides the accusations of attempting to build an arsenal of nuclear weapons -- which haven't gone away -- Iran is now taking additional heat for allegedly supplying weapons to militants in Iraq and Afghanistan. Just last week, according to an Associated Press article, Admiral William Fallon, the head of the U.S. Central Command, stated: "The Iranians are clearly supplying some amount of lethal aid… There is no doubt…that agents from Iran are involved in aiding the insurgency."

Now, before we take the highly-charged statements of an upper-level American military official on faith, remember all of the lies that George W. Bush and his henchmen fed us about Saddam Hussein. Hussein had Iraq on the path to nuclear weapons, we were told. Hussein had financed the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda, we were told. Hussein had stockpiled hundreds of tons of weapons of mass destruction -- biological and chemical weapons designed to exterminate large civilian populations with one strike, we were told.

Now, it's Iran that has ambitions about nuclear weapons. Now, it's Iran that is financing and supporting terrorist groups. If, in the next couple of months, Iran is accused of stockpiling weapons of mass destruction… well, I don't think our enemies are THAT stupid, to give us THAT lie two times in such short succession.

But I DO think that our enemies are quite willing to lie about anything, if they think that will work to their advantage. And you shouldn't believe one word that our enemies say until it is verified by other sources. We've been lied to so many times; I've learned my lesson, and I hope you have, too.

As the threats by the Western powers of MORE sanctions against Iran have grown more strident over the last couple of months -- with no sign that the Islamic Republic will back down with her nuclear ambitions -- the hints of future war with Iran have been dropped with more and more frequency by Jews and those controlled by Jews. Admiral Fallon, whom I mentioned above, stated that the U.S. would "act decisively" if Iran continued giving aid to insurgents.

And it isn't just American Jews who are pushing buttons. The one-quarter Jewish president of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, has called himself "a friend of Israel" and is very willing to support Bush's war ambitions in the Middle East -- at least in terms of moral support, if not men and arms. The one-half Jewish French foreign minister, Bernard Kouchner -- who was appointed by Sarkozy -- is even more open about killing the enemies of Israel. Kouchner told Europeans last week that the world needs to prepare for the possibility of war in Iran.

Kouchner, whose caustic Jewish nature might have momentarily gotten the best of him when he spilled the beans last week about the Jewish plans for war in Iran, is half-Jewish on his father's side. His paternal grandparents were Russian Jews who allegedly escaped the pogroms by moving to France before the Second World War, only to allegedly die at Auschwitz during the German occupation of France. So it will be interesting to see how France's isolationist stance of the last few decades will change now that some ambitious Jews are propped at the top of the French political structure.

More hints about a war with Iran are likely to follow in the upcoming months. The media liars will probably say that it will be an "unfortunate" but "necessary" war. More lies about the alleged dastardly deeds and intentions of Iran will be tossed about without the slightest suggestion that there is any uncertainty about whether those are REALLY the deeds and intentions of the Islamic state. More character assassination of Iran's president and its other leaders WILL happen as this year rolls into the next.

There IS a desire on the part of the Jews to destroy Iran by force. It's just a question of whether or not they can stack the deck in their favor and convince the lemmings that this is just another dirty job that no one wants, but that HAS to be done.

There are at least three negatives that I can think of about war with Iran. One, I'm not convinced that the Iranians are guilty of everything they have been accused of and, moreover, even if they are shown to be guilty of all of it, I'm not convinced that they need to be punished for it. Two, we don't need another region of the Earth to stock with American troops, wasting our money and our resources and our blood. And three, I can't stand it when the Jews get other people to do their dirty work for them, and that is exactly what we would be doing.

Keep your eyes open and take note of how the Jewish media continue to deal with the Jews' little problem in Iran. And let's hope that their plans to force us into another Middle East war go unfulfilled.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me today.