Hello, and welcome back to this week’s broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.
Most Americans have a hard time staying clear of the television during the holiday season, and during the rest of the year, for that matter. But especially during the holiday season, at least for men, when all of the college football bowl games, the college basketball games, and the final regular-season NFL games are on… well, let’s just say those make for good excuses for people to gather in front of the TV and eat.
Anyway, it should be obvious from all of the commercials on TV that there are always new and better technology-related devices to buy or to subscribe to. Devices for getting onto the Internet from any location whatsoever, for downloading and playing music and movies, as well as phones that are still called “phones” even though being a traditional talk-and-listen phone is now only a small part of what they do. And “all of the above” – and more – is basically what they do.
The list goes on: new desktop computers, new laptop computers, new printers, scanners, cameras, as well as accessories for all of that technology. The pace of communication technology development is truly breathtaking and – I might add – difficult for many of us who grew up in the “dark ages” of the 1970s to understand (if we can) and then keep up with. The ease and speed with which information travels makes up-to-the-minute news a fact of life for millions of Americans.
But it isn’t just communication technology; it is all kinds of technology that Western science has made possible. The armed forces advertisements on TV aren’t lying; the technology that we glimpse on those elements of propaganda is more fact than fiction. When the U.S. Air Force tells us on TV: “It’s not science fiction,” they aren’t kidding. Most people can’t even imagine all of the bells and whistles and gadgets that today’s military carries in its utility belt. The closest we civilians can get to that kind of thing is the latest spy-thriller novel or James Bond movie. But today I’d like to discuss the probable future with regard to another fast-paced area of science and technology: the advancements that have been made in genetic engineering.
Genetic engineering is the purposeful manipulation of genetic material by man to produce organisms that are improvements over existing stock. Of course, the term “improvement” must be defined for a particular manipulation, but generally the term refers to a stronger, healthier organism, or one that has particular traits that earlier versions of the organism didn’t have.
There have been many successes with genetic engineering. As just one example, the DNA of certain bacteria has been altered such that the bacteria are now able to produce human insulin that can be used by diabetics. Many crops have been made more disease-resistant through genetic techniques. There are other examples, but you get the idea.
The idea of altering the genetic makeup of a given type of organism is not new. Breeders of domesticated animals have known the basic ideas for improving the average quality of their herds for thousands of years: you give the most fit individuals every possible opportunity to mate and so engender the maximum number of desirable offspring. And as for the weakest members of the herd? Well, even if they came out on the shallow end of the gene pool in terms of health and strength, they still tasted good, fresh and hot off the spit.
Anyway, those basic ideas have been applied to the human gene pool as well. Populations of a given race have long opposed any intrusion upon their turf by foreign racial elements, the idea being that the foreign elements would lower the average level of quality of the native race. That is, the native race opposed anything that might interfere with its own elevation of itself.
The Jews are probably the best example of a race that vehemently opposes violation of its blood. This, of course, hasn’t stopped millions of Jews from marrying outside the ranks of the so-called “Chosen,” but none of that has altered the stance of the great mass of Jews who still value the protection of the Jewish race above all else…with the possible exception of the chance to damage or humiliate another race while, at the same time, raking in loads of cash that isn’t derived from any productive activity. But that is a story for another day.
During the middle of the last century, the German National Socialists employed eugenic methods in an effort to improve the average stock of the German people. After legally acquiring power in national, democratic elections, the National Socialists encouraged healthy Germans to have large families, going so far as to award medals to German mothers who bore a large number of healthy babies. This served to elevate the genetic stock of the German nation and partially compensated for the loss of millions of Germans during Germany’s titanic struggle against the beast of Soviet Communism.
On the other hand, the National Socialists also did a good job of putting a tourniquet on the German blood that had gone sour. They sterilized tens of thousands of mentally retarded individuals, chronically diseased people, and habitual criminals. Of course, the mentioning of such things brings sighs of condemnation from the soft-headed multiracialists of today. But, considering the traits that were important to the National Socialists – and to any healthy society of whatever race, basically – what more humane thing could be done to reduce the impact on future generations of what must be called, to be honest, botched or degenerate people? Would future generations be BETTER OFF having a greater number of the mentally incompetent, unhealthy, and degenerates? The obvious answer is NO, and the most humane way the National Socialists found to affect a solution was sterilization of those deemed unlikely to promote the security and progress of the society. As painful as it sounds, the fact remains that in the mass production of anything, there is a certain fraction of defective products; that fact is no less true in the mass production of human beings that has been made possible over the last few hundred years due to medical advances.
Now, I don’t expect the mushy-brained flutterhearts to be satisfied with my defense of National Socialist policies of promoting healthy offspring on the one hand and forced sterilization of defectives on the other. For them, all of this is one tiny step away from gas chambers and crematoria, which were allegedly used to kill six million Jews and millions of others during the so-called Holocaust. Now, aside from the dearth of solid evidence that any such event as the Holocaust took place (and the obvious absurdity of the logistics that would be required to carry out such an event), that subject would lead us too far off the path for today, so I won’t go into it here.
But everything I’ve said above is in no way any kind of promotion of anything resembling the fictitious events of the so-called Holocaust. I’ve simply pointed out that, by encouraging healthy Germans to have large families and by nipping “bad” blood in the bud, if you will, the National Socialists were doing what they could to make the German nation better for the future.
You know, this idea – the maintaining if not improving the quality of the gene pool – is NOT an exotic or off-the-wall concept. When parents worry about whether young Sam’s girlfriend or Sally’s boyfriend is “good enough,” at the root of their worries is a concern about the quality of future potential offspring. When the elderly refuse to spend on themselves the large amounts of money they have accumulated over the years, and instead insist on saving it as much as they can so that their children and grandchildren can have an inheritance, it is because they are wanting the next generation to go further than they were able to. And when people complain about crime rates or the demographic makeup of this or that neighborhood, it is because they don’t want what they perceive to be the negative influences from “those” people to drag down the quality of life for “us.”
Yes, the idea of human quality – both the maintenance of it and the increase in it – pervades the culture of virtually every people on Earth. In fact, I believe that many of the behaviors I just mentioned that are commonplace among people aren’t even conscious behaviors. They are ones that people just “do,” almost entirely without thinking about it. In other words, we are wired to think that way, and to NOT think that way goes against the inherent structure of our psyche that has brought us from the level of the apes to the point where we are able to destroy every human on Earth by punching a few well-sequenced buttons on a few control panels connected to nuclear warheads. It is the contention of White racialist thinkers that the Jewish propaganda machine has been working for many decades to weaken and break down these instinctual patterns of behavior in the White population, which naturally leads to the confusing of our instincts and the resultant willingness of Whites to be open in every way to the incursions of non-Whites.
Furthermore, it seems that we humans – of every race, I’d like to stress – are not the only ones who are naturally wired to have an eye for genetic quality. In every ecological niche, it is the strong and best-fit individuals who dominate the weak and less fit. The result is that the strong produce, on average, more offspring than the weak, and the entire population of that organism experiences an increase in the average level of strength or – we might more appropriately say – an increase in the average level of fitness for life and success within a given ecological niche. What the German National Socialists did consciously, the lion and wolf and raccoon – and even the prairie grass and oak tree – do unconsciously. This observation of nature was first made by Darwin, who formalized it for the rest of us in his theory of natural selection. Basically, natural selection is the improvement of a species’ gene pool as the MOST important function of a population. In animals and plants, it isn’t conscious, at least in terms of improving the population, instead usually disguising itself as the will of an individual to simply live. But there is no denying that it serves to elevate the species.
We in the National Alliance want to elevate the White race to new levels of greatness. To do that, we first need to secure a homogeneous White living space that is guided by a White government that puts the long-term needs of the race above everything else. Without those, our desire to improve the genetic stock of our people will be largely unfulfilled. WITH them, however, many things are possible, including the application of the knowledge and techniques of genetic engineering to aid us.
I don’t mean to suggest that any White race of the future will be a genetically-engineered race. Much of what we are after will be achieved through more traditional – one might say “natural” – means such as sterilization of certain individuals and the encouragement of more gifted ones to have large families. But there is no denying that genetic engineering has incredible potential in terms of human quality, and for us to ignore such potential would be shortsighted, to say the least.
I’m not saying here that the use of genetic engineering technology to improve humans is inherently good or bad; all I’m saying is that, because the technology is available, it is only a matter of time before someone, somewhere decides to use it in an effort to make better humans. The idea is already very prevalent as the subject of many suspense-thriller novels and films featuring superheroes like Spiderman and the Incredible Hulk. For all we know, the Chinese have already started a biogenetics program to try to improve the stock of the most abundant people on the planet. THAT is a sobering thought, if there ever was one, and it is just another hint that Western man needs to get his act together before our genes are rubbed out of existence by an army of super-Chinese.
Anyway, as I said earlier, our first step must be to secure a White racial homeland. Let’s get on with that, and then we can tackle the genetic quality problem later.
I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.
