Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.
Today, I'd like to discuss with you an image that American racialists have struggled with for nearly a century. That image is that White racialists are enemies of progress, enemies of change; that is, we have been perceived as foot-draggers who are opposed to just about everything new. Today I'm going to suggest that the days of White racialists shouldering that image are over. Today, the enemies of progress and change are our opponents; that is, the Jews and their allies.
This image of White patriots being merely reactionaries began to form in the minds of the American public early in the 20th Century. At that time, anti-Communists in this country began vocalizing their resistance to the spread of that Jewish creed, opposing its spread from the Soviet Union into the Western Hemisphere. About the same time, a few Whites noticed that Jews were buying up the existing newspapers and film companies. When that wasn't enough, the Jews began founding their own media corporations. Some Whites forecasted into the future the possible consequences of total alien ownership of the media companies -- which is essentially the deplorable situation we have today -- and they voiced their opposition to that group controlling our channels of information.
Later, in the 1930s, the great aviator Charles Lindbergh, as head of the America First Committee, did everything in his power to keep the United States out of the Second World War. His efforts failed, however, when Roosevelt and his so-called "Brain Trust" -- FDR's advisory group composed almost totally of Jews -- managed to paint the Japanese into such a tight corner that they felt they had no choice but to attack us at Pearl Harbor. The Washington authorities, of course, knew of the impending attack beforehand but deliberately kept that valuable information from the commanders in Hawaii. But that story has been written elsewhere. I urge you to discover those facts for yourself if you are one of those who, until now, believed that the Japanese attack was a complete surprise to everyone.
My point so far is that there were many intelligent American patriots in the first half of the 20th Century who realized that such things as the spread of Communism, the Jewish takeover of our media, and our involvement in World War II would bring nothing good to our nation and race. The problem was that these critics offered little in the way of alternatives. They didn't offer White Americans any positive goals to shoot for. They kept emphasizing the negative: "We don't want THAT."
The Jews, with all of their media power, were quite happy to portray these White dissidents as crotchety nay-sayers, complainers who just sat around dreaming about the good old days. The Jews and their allies, on the other hand, were portrayed as progressive movers and shakers, people who were willing to offer up a new vision of the future and to take action to make that future a reality. They convinced many Americans that they were going somewhere new and that they were willing to try new things. In doing so, the Jews got the masses on their bandwagon, or at least disarmed them morally from opposing the Jews' plans. There were, to be sure, some Americans who remained convinced that the country was going in the wrong direction, but they couldn't very well explain why.
The trend continued following the Second World War. In 1948, President Truman integrated the armed forces by executive order. Many Americans, particularly those in the multiracial South, were vocal about NOT wanting that. The opposition grew after the Supreme Court's infamous Brown v. Board of Education ruling, which destroyed the legal basis for segregated schools. But again, White patriots who knew in their hearts that our nation was making bad choices, made too much use of the "We don't want THAT" approach. It was becoming obvious what we didn't want, but what did we want? The only ones who were offering up a new vision of any kind seemed to be the Jews.
As the so-called Civil Rights Era continued, the "We don't want THAT" tactic became more and more worn out. It isn't too much to say that White patriots did a fine job of earning the label of being hopeless cranks. Many people opposed the passage of the Immigration Act of 1965, which abolished the national-origin quotas outlined in the U.S. immigration laws of 1924 (even representatives of Congress, if you can imagine that!). Spessard Holland, a Democratic Senator from Florida, said during the Senate debates over the 1965 legislation:
"What I object to is imposing no limitation insofar as areas of the earth are concerned, but saying that we are throwing the doors open and equally inviting people from the Orient, from the islands of the Pacific, from the subcontinent of Asia, from the Near East, from all of Africa, all of Europe, and all of the Western Hemisphere on exactly the same basis. I am inviting attention to the fact that this is a complete and radical departure from what have always heretofore been regarded as sound principles of immigration."
And although today's White racialists are in complete agreement with Holland's views, it should be noted that the statement I just read is totally a defensive one. It is a "We don't want THAT" statement. It is a "We've never done it THAT way before" statement.
It should go without saying that the 1924 immigration laws were much more White-friendly. In comparison, the 1965 legislation essentially threw down all doors at the borders. One doesn't have to look very hard today to see the villainous effects of that legislation. Many concerned White people spoke up at the time, saying, "We don't want THAT," but without an alternative vision and a plan by which to get there, most mainstream Whites just sighed and rolled their eyes at the patriots' objections.
The same can be said of what happened in subsequent decades. In the 1970s, when many Whites worldwide saw the impending doom of White Rhodesia (now the criminal jungle of disease and poverty known as Zimbabwe), some of them spoke up: "We don't want THAT." As the factories and mines began to close all across America, ordinary Americans found themselves out of work. If they were bold enough to object, all they could think to say was: "We don't want THAT." The Jews overrode our people's weak objections, telling us that our goods would be made overseas now, using cheap labor from the Third World. Then, we Americans would be able to buy those goods at lower cost than we would if we had produced them ourselves. "It's the new vision of things and it's better," they told us, in a thousand different ways. The Jews kept selling a new vision of the world, and we just didn't have a good response. All we wanted was "NOT THAT," and "NOT THAT" has no convincing power.
And from the 1980s to the present, it has been more of the same. More immigration, with its consequent weakening of our nation and race. More dismemberment of our industrial machine, which destroys the ability of our nation to fend for itself -- or, put another way, it makes us economically dependent on non-White nations whose commitment to our well-being is never on solid ground. More race-mixing indoctrination by the omnipotent Jewish media. More of this, more of that... things kept getting browner, more atomized, more unbearable for healthy Whites.
But then a strange thing happened. The Jews' vision suddenly had nothing fundamentally new to offer White Americans. Sure, our enemies will always want MORE deindustrialization, MORE racial diversity, MORE non-White immigration, MORE White guilt-tripping in the schools and churches, but nothing new. The vision of the Jews is "Same old, same old."
In other words, the Jewish vision for our people has become old, tired, boring. It has worn itself out. Like a magician who keeps performing the same trick over and over, the Jewish vision is failing to hold the attention of astute Whites who are searching for more.
The Western world today -- a diseased world that is the brainchild of the Jews -- has gross flaws that are impossible to miss. A bumper sticker I once saw read, "If you're not appalled, you're not paying attention." And that's the truth. The handiwork of the Jews is now here, right in front of our eyes, right in our own neighborhoods and places of employment. It's right there in our newspapers and on our televisions. And it is obvious to every perceptive White American that the Jews have nothing new to offer, nothing new to push for, no new trinket to dangle in the faces of the masses: just more of the same old stuff.
The Cause of White racialism, on the other hand, now finds itself as the provider of the new vision. What we want is new and exciting: a monoracial homeland; a White government; a new system of education. We want new art -- new music, new architecture, new paintings, new sculpture, new literature and poetry -- art that glorifies Life's struggle to better itself, art that celebrates our racial spirit and our racial hopes. It is a beautiful new vision, a vision of youth, and it stands ahead of us as a beacon of sanity, guiding our people into the future.
A vision of light and youth flickered for a short time in Germany during the middle of the 20th Century. The White racialist vision of today is not the same as the vision promoted in National Socialist Germany, although there are many similarities. Some of these similarities are the emphasis on race, personal honor, the leadership principle, economic independence, and environmental responsibility.
Outside of Germany, although the White masses were not ready for the National Socialist plan for White self-determination, the White minority was. Discerning White men throughout Europe were inspired by the vision of youth and vigor promoted by Hitler. Thousands of young men from every country of Europe volunteered for the German armed forces in the death-struggle that occurred on the Eastern Front between National Socialism and Communism.
National Socialism was a movement that found its strength in the young people of Germany. The old ways had failed, and Hitler offered a worldview that was young and vital; it re-energized the German people. This energy was evident throughout Germany during the 1930s and was absent throughout most of the rest of Europe. William Joyce, an Irishman better known to his radio audience as "Lord Haw-Haw," traveled to Germany and volunteered his talents to the German broadcasting service. In Joyce's book entitled Twilight Over England, he writes about how Britain is in need of a youth movement like the one that revitalized Germany:
"The men who rule England are old. The class that holds supremacy is tarnished and decayed. There is much demoralization among the British people. But the pulse of historic youth still beats, however faintly."
That's the situation we have in America today. The old vision of the Jews is chipped in many places. It has lost its luster. Our vision of a White homeland and a White government is coming into focus as an alternative of hope and meaning. Whether by design or by chance, the time of our vision of youth and vigor has arrived.
We know that its time has arrived because more and more Whites are answering the call of the new vision. With a mulatto president, uncontrolled Third World immigration, growing unemployment and manufacturing jobs being shipped to the Far East and Third World countries, among other things, the hope for a nice, conservative solution is seen by more Whites every day as laughable, and they are beginning to listen to our message more than ever before. The Jewish vision for our people is a weary vision. It can no longer motivate our people. The White racialist Cause can.
So I say it again: The Jews and the multiracialists are the foot-draggers and the crotchety nay-sayers of today. They are the ones who say we CAN'T have a White homeland; they say we CAN'T un-integrate our multiracial society; they say we CAN'T have our own government; they say it WON'T work; they say it's best to just keep things the way they are, with the White population slowly breeding itself into extinction.
Their time is nearing its end. We White racialists are the keepers of the new vision. And because of that vision and the hard work of many White patriots, we are the ones who are moving ahead. We are the ones gaining momentum. We are the movers and shakers. We are the progressives.
And the Jewish vision -- the one that has brought us to this point, the one that has shown that it is killing our people? We aim to leave it WAY behind.
Help us in this venture.
I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.
