Hello, and welcome back to this week’s broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.
The debate over immigration has been in the spotlight again recently. Following the lead of Arizona, which enacted a state law that requires police to check the immigration status of people who police have reason to suspect are in the country illegally, several other states have proposed their own “tough” immigration bills, with little success so far. The memory of 58-year-old American rancher Rob Krentz of Cochise County, who was shot to death along with his dog on March 27, is still fresh in many people’s minds. And now President Barack Obama has decided to send another 1,500 National Guard troops to the southwestern border to – allegedly – aid in stemming the tide of illegal immigrants from Mexico.
The fact that illegal immigrants present a hardship to the United States is well documented. The economic cost is high, with tax dollars spent on education, medical treatment, and housing costs for illegals. Cheap immigrant labor takes valuable work away from American citizens, who then have trouble paying the bills. And it is virtually impossible to guess at the annual cost for law enforcement with regard to illegal immigrants: tracking down, rounding up, and deporting the same illegals over and over again, not to mention the huge cost due to the many illegals who are involved in the drug trade and are quite pleased to bring their dirty business into this country to poison the minds and empty the wallets of American idiots.
The opponents of illegal immigration who are allowed to participate in the immigration debate by the Jewish-controlled mass media almost always take the stance that illegal immigration has negative economic costs to the individual states and to the whole country. This is the safest position to take, in the sense that the Jews who manage what the rest of us see and hear on television find it the least objectionable.
And the reason the Jews find the economic angle on illegal immigration to be the least objectionable is because it is basically without any real substance. The days of American colonists stampeding into a bitter war over a tax on stamps and tea are long gone; no one is going to call for a new nation or a new government over a few hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars wasted on nurturing the lives of illegal immigrants. No; if the United States is going to become involved in any war again, it would have to be over something really noble and highly idealistic – like invading the sovereign state of Iraq in order to cut down a competitor of Israel in the Middle East, for example.
The last part of the preceding statement was sarcasm, for those of you who might otherwise have missed it.
Anyway, once again, most of the opponents of illegal immigration who get airtime from the Jewish media take the nearly spineless stance that illegal immigration does harm to the American economy. A slightly stronger stance is taken by those who see the immigration problem as an issue of rights. The rationale of those who subscribe to this viewpoint goes something like this:
“As American citizens, we obey American laws and pay our taxes. In return, American local, state, and federal governments should work in concert and take whatever measures are needed to protect the rights and property of the legal citizens of this country.
“Illegal immigrants flout American laws. They DON’T pay taxes. As a consequence, American local, state, and federal governments should work in concert and take whatever measures are needed to stop illegal immigrants – who have no rights, or SHOULDN’T have any rights – from living in this country, from working in this country… basically, from GETTING INTO or BEING in this country.”
As you might expect, the “rights” stance isn’t as popular with the Jewish media, which – as you know – does what it does in an effort to wipe out the biggest competitor of the Jews in this country; that is, the White population whose ancestors founded and built the country from a wilderness into a civilization. The “rights” stance, of course, smacks of good old-fashioned American patriotism, the kind of patriotism that Americans used to have before the Jewish media made it appear to be more-or-less a type of senile delirium for crotchety old fogies. The Jews want the debate to appear to be balanced, of course, so they begrudgingly allow the advocates of the “rights” stance to say their piece on national TV every so often, sometimes even on network news programs.
Now, the problem that White racialists have with the “rights” stance on illegal immigration is that it put the concept of rights ABOVE the idea of WHOM the rights belong to. In other words, the “rights” advocates focus more on the rules (which is basically what rights are) than on the human material for which the rules are meant to apply. We racialists contend that, with the right human material, everyone agrees much sooner on what the rules should be and, in fact, you don’t even need quite as many rules because everyone operates on the basis of UNDERSTOOD rules that everybody accepts without hardly thinking that to write them down would be an insult to the intelligence. Besides, good old mindless American patriotism isn’t always the best thing; look what it did to the White race’s most recent attempt to free itself from the strangling grip of Jewish thought and Jewish power during the Second World War. So we need to take American patriotism with a grain of salt, but no White racialist will deny that rights are a good idea in general.
And, incidentally, no White racialist will deny that the federal government – as shown by its incompetence and fumbling with the immigration issue in the Southwest – doesn’t give a damn about the rights of American citizens. Nor will you hear a racialist deny the immense cost to the economy posed by the illegal immigrants. Both of those stances are valid; they are just weak in comparison to the stance of race.
The racial stance on the illegal immigration question gets to the bedrock of the problem. For this reason, the Jewish media doesn’t want the racial stance to get any publicity and, when it does, they make sure to put the spin on it that the racial stance is taken only by people filled with hate, who are basically criminals who haven’t yet been caught doing anything that would warrant them being locked away for life in a federal penitentiary. The Jews in the media and government take great pains to make those who take the racial stance to be the recipients of a constant and overwhelming campaign of vehemence and ridicule. The summative effect is just what the Jews want: a meek and passive American public composed of individuals too scared to speak up about what they really feel with regard to the racial implications of the illegal immigration issue.
The racial stance on the illegal immigration issue (or ANY issue, for that matter) is the strongest one because all of the other stances, in a sense, feed into the racial one. For example, if the racial problem is ever resolved, with Whites having their own separate living space and racial-state, the economic issues will be relatively straightforward to address. If the racial problem is ever resolved, with Whites having their own separate living space and racial-state, the issues about the rights of citizens being jealously guarded by a White government that takes its responsibility for its citizens’ lives and property seriously will be relatively straightforward to address. It isn’t like there won’t be any challenges – there are ALWAYS challenges, no matter what – but the society will function a lot more smoothly and peacefully than does any multiracial state, such as the one we have now.
But it should be obvious to everyone that President Obama’s “effort” (is THAT what it is?) his so-called “effort” to help shore up the leaky border by deploying 1,500 more National Guard troops is so naïve that it would be funny if it weren’t so tragic. So what should President Obama do? Should he deploy more National Guardsmen? Would 5,000 do the trick? 10,000? 50,000?
Well, I doubt first of all that President Obama really wants to take the mestizos at the border over his knee and spank them like a little boy who put Sally’s pigtail in the ink well at the old one-room schoolhouse. All of the racial kin of the border-jumpers helped vote him into the White House, and he knows already that if he wants to stay there for another term, he is going to have to do some serious apologizing to the Latino community at some point in the near future, even for this trifling effort of sending 1,500 weekend-army-men to the border.
Even if President Obama DID have the “cojones” to really go after the mestizo illegals at the border by sending 50,000 National Guardsmen down there, he would hard-pressed at this time to scrape up 50,000 because many of them are serving in the Middle East, fighting a war that none of them understand, in terms of exactly WHY the hell they are there. But let’s assume not only that Barack wants results so bad that he is willing to do whatever it takes AND that he is able to find enough warm bodies in the military to carry it out.
It would fail.
It would fail because the illegal immigration problem isn’t just at the border. The illegal immigration problem permeates our entire society.
The new illegals now trying to get in are aided by the knowledge of those who are trying for the second or third or fifty-eighth time to get in, and by those who have made it in and been caught and thrown out, again and again. The illegals are aided when they do make it into the country by the huge support network of legal and illegal Latinos not only in the Southwest, but all over the U.S.
The illegal immigration problem resides in the hearts and minds of Latinos who are American citizens and who work tirelessly within the existing system to make it easier for their racial kinsmen to get into the country and to get jobs.
The illegal immigration problem resides in the hearts and minds of White American one-worlders, who fight for a cause that can only result in the weakening of their own racial stock.
The illegal immigration problem, at root, is a worldview problem; it exists only because most Americans subscribe to one of various worldviews that CANNOT adequately address such problems as the illegal immigration issue. These various worldviews cannot adequately address other racial issues either, such as the Jewish monopoly of the world of media and world of finance. Nor can it adequately address issues such as adoption of non-White children by White parents, interracial marriage, and homosexuality.
What we need in order to adequately address the illegal immigration issue is a new worldview, a worldview based on the solid facts of biology and race. With such a worldview as a starting point, it becomes possible to meet all the challenges that our race now faces, not just the ones that flare up in the Jewish media from time to time, like illegal immigration.
The National Alliance is an organization that was founded on just the kind of worldview that our race needs to free itself from the evolutionary quicksand in which we find ourselves and move it forward along an evolutionary path toward higher life. We need your energy, your enthusiasm, your support, your dedication, and your determination in order to address the issues that threaten the existence of our people. Make the decision to become a part of an organization that seeks to create a safe and progressive racial-state for our kind.
I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.
