Hello, and welcome back to this week’s broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

The Israeli blockade of the Gaza strip surely isn’t “new” news, but today I’d like to spend a few minutes talking about that, in conjunction with some recent events related to the blockade.

Ever since Hamas gained control of Gaza in June of 2007, Israel has encircled the entire strip of land, which measures only about 25 miles by five-and-a-half miles. The Gaza strip is located on the west coast of Israel along the Mediterranean Sea. Gaza shares about six miles of its southern border with Egypt, while its entire 25-mile eastern border and its 5-mile northern border abuts with Israeli territory. Israeli naval vessels have blockaded access to Gaza from the sea; Israeli ground forces have surrounded the region on land. In essence, the Jews have actively laid siege to Gaza for three years, with only a few minors reprieves. The only key difference between a true siege and the Israeli blockade of Gaza is that the Jews have allowed the barest amounts of essentials into the region, enough to keep most of the 1.5 million Palestinians there alive, but just on the edge of starvation. For those of us who spend time observing the Jews and looking for patterns, this behavior on their part doesn’t surprise us at all. For the naïve among the White populations of Europe and America, the actions of the Israelis are shocking.

A few statistics and quotes compiled by BBC News in Jerusalem should make the situation clear.

According to an article for BBC News by Heather Sharp ( HYPERLINK "http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7545636.stm" http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7545636.stm) Amnesty International has called the Gaza blockade “collective punishment” that has given rise to a “humanitarian crisis.” The term “collective punishment,” of course, refers here to the non-Hamas Palestinians in Gaza, all of whom are paying a price for Israel’s inability to communicate with – and negotiate a peace with – the pro-Palestinian group Hamas. The term “humanitarian crisis” refers to the suffering that Israel has deliberately inflicted on the Gaza-bound Palestinians.

According to the BBC’s article, the people of Gaza are surviving on about one-fourth of the supplies that were imported into the region in December 2005, before the Israeli blockade.

The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization reports that 61% of Gazans are what they call “food insecure.” The UN agency for Palestinian refugees reports that 80% of Gazans rely on some type of food aid.

Unemployment in the region is close to 40%. No doubt this statistic is related to the number of Gazans who can’t afford basic necessities such as soap and clean drinking water having tripled since 2007. A UN survey in 2008 found that more than half of Gazan families had sold any non-essential assets and were buying food on credit. The same survey found that nearly all Gazans were eating fewer fruits, vegetables, and animal protein in order to save money. In other words, while there might be enough calories in the average Gazan’s diet to sustain life (from, presumably, carbohydrate-based foods), the food that has real value (by providing vitamins, minerals, and necessary proteins) is being kept away from the people of Gaza by the Israeli blockade on both land and sea.

This nutritional deprivation that is a direct result of Jewish heartlessness cannot help but have negative consequences in the short run, and disastrous consequences in the long run. These consequences are evident right now; the World Health Organization reports that about one-third of Gazan children under five and one-third of Gazan women of childbearing age suffer from anemia, a blood condition caused by an iron deficiency that manifests in an abnormally low red blood cell count.

Even if enough animal protein and vegetables made it into Gaza despite the Israeli blockade, there is a shortage of fuel to cook them. Oxfam reports that the amount of fuel available for use in cooking is somewhere between one-third and one-half of what is needed. The same organization reported in April of this year that Gazan households are often without electricity between 20 and 35% of the time. Raw goat meat, anyone?

The Israeli blockade has created an environmental hazard with regard to the water and sewage systems of Gaza. Because replacement parts, treatment chemicals, and fuel have been severely reduced by the Israelis, pumps and generators that break down in the water and sewage infrastructure cannot be adequately fixed. In January of this year, roughly half of Gaza’s population had no access to piped water, and 80% of the water that DID reach taps in Gaza fails to meet the World Health Organization’s standards for drinking water quality. And, as every literate person in the world today knows, poor drinking water quality and epidemics go hand in hand. Where there is one, there is (or there soon will be) the other.

And while we have heard quite a bit about the oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and its colossal environmental consequences, most of us haven’t heard much about the 13 million gallons of raw or improperly-treated sewage from Gaza that is dumped EVERY DAY into the Mediterranean Sea… an avoidable environmental consequence that the Jews have caused – and have prevented anyone else from fixing – with their inhuman blockade of Gaza.

And one cannot forget that, in any region where a military conflict is occurring, there is bound to be damage to infrastructure (roads, sewers, bridges, public buildings, and so on) as well as to homes and businesses. To quote directly from the BBC article I cited earlier in this broadcast: “The UN says restrictions on cement have made the reconstruction of 12,000 Palestinian homes damaged or destroyed in Israeli military operations ‘impossible’.”

And later on in the same article, another quote: “A few hundred tonnes of cement entered Gaza in the first half of 2010, but aid organisations say this is a fraction of the need - Gisha (an Israeli rights organization) says 70,000 tonnes arrived monthly before the blockade.”

What I’ve done here so far is simply relate a few of the facts, compiled by various national and international organizations, related to the Israeli blockade of Gaza. Again, I refer you to a reputable source ( HYPERLINK "http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7545636.stm" http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7545636.stm) to check these for yourself.

Now, let’s move on to other aspects of the Israeli blockade of Gaza.

Firstly, it is only logical that certain groups from various countries would try to “run” the blockade out of a sense of humanitarianism for the suffering people of Gaza. Some don’t even try to “run” the blockade, but instead simply put to sea in hopes of “petitioning” their way past the Israeli naval ships and delivering their relief supplies to Gaza. That sort of thing has been going on ever since the blockade began, with little success. After all, when Jews decide they are going to do something, they are pretty good at covering all their bases; they don’t let too much slip past them. Hell, all of Israeli-occupied Palestine is basically one massive exercise in checkpoints and the managed traffic of everything – humans and otherwise… the Jews had better be good at that kind of thing.

Now, because the Jews are so good at partitioning off certain locales and preventing all unwanted material from getting into those locales, all that REALLY means is that the Jews know very precisely what is getting into Gaza and in what quantities. It isn’t a case of: “Well, we Jews aren’t very good at blockades, so there is probably quite of bit of relief material that is getting into Gaza beyond what we let in. So we don’t feel too bad about the blockade because the Palestinians in Gaza are getting lots of supplies from smugglers.” No. What that means is that the Jews are consciously choosing to make the Palestinians of Gaza suffer, and if the history of the Jews gives us any information at all about their character, we can surmise that they are deriving a good deal of pleasure from the knowledge that they are causing another racial group to suffer.

Anyway, in the last week or so, a few Turkish boats tried to get past the Israeli blockade. None of them made it, and the Israelis boarded one of the ships, killing nine Turks in the process. It’s uncertain as to whether or not any of the Turks aboard the ship had any kind of “terrorist” activity planned (as the Jews claim), however, these are the kinds of problems that are going to plague the Jews for taking such a hard line on everything.

Now just imagine how the “American” media would respond to Germany or Britain or Sweden if any of those countries did something like what Israel is doing to Gaza. And what if the besieged people weren’t Palestinians, but rather Jews? Actually, I think we know what would happen; the Jewish media throughout the world would condemn those nations, economic sanctions would be immediately applied, and the American State Department would threaten to and probably would use military force. Remember what the Jewish-run U.S. State Department under the Clinton Administration did to Serbia back in 1999? They used NATO forces to bomb the Serbs into submission and take land from them.

Through this blockade and their other actions in the Middle East, the Jews, in effect, are blockading themselves from the empathy and good will of other nations. And at some point in the future, the Jews will reap what they sow.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.