Hello, and welcome back to this week’s broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.
It’s been a couple of rough months for the American military effort in Afghanistan recently. A few days ago, we were told that the American death toll in July was the largest of any month so far, breaking the previous American death count that was set in Afghanistan only the month before. Top military brass have said that it is likely that things aren’t going to get any easier within the foreseeable future.
Ironic, isn’t it, how George W. Bush’s little Afghan war started out so easy after 9/11? If you recall, by late 2001, Bush and his Jewish advisors hadn’t been able to come up with lies that sounded good enough to convince the American public to send the troops to bring down Saddam Hussein in Iraq. But we HAD been told that Osama Bin Laden and al Qaeda were holed up in Afghanistan under that nasty Taliban regime, and Bush made that country seem like a justified target.
So we put thousands of boots on the ground in Afghanistan, and we swept the Taliban out of power and tried to bring in more of a Western style of government. Of course, without the strong arm of the Taliban to keep the money-mongers in check, the opium farmers were able to come out of the closet and plow the earth without interference to produce plenty of the building block substance for heroin.
By the time Afghanistan had been slapped into shape, Bush and the Jewish Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz had cooked up the right lies to stampede the herd into Iraq. The Jewish White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer helped to sell the lies to his Jewish cronies in the media, and together they all sold it to the American lemmings.
So in March of 2003, there were more boots on the ground, this time in Iraq. And it wasn’t long before the established government in Iraq had been dismantled, and only slightly longer before Saddam Hussein was hanged.
Ostensibly, Hussein was hanged in December of 2006 for “crimes against humanity” associated with his conduct towards residents of a specific locality following an unsuccessful assassination attempt of Hussein… way back in 1982. That’s right, more than 20 years previous. Anyway, the real reason that Saddam had to die was because – for basically his entire life – he had flouted the State of Israel, denounced it at every turn, and acted to oppose its expansion and influence. In the eyes of the Jews, those sins aren’t forgivable, and are sometimes punishable by death… as in the case of Saddam Hussein.
For a while following the taming of Afghanistan and the invasion of Iraq, the “lucky” American troops were the ones who were serving in Afghanistan. During that period, if your neighbor asked about your son in the Army and you told him he was being shipped out in two weeks to Afghanistan, your neighbor invariably replied, “Oh, that’s good.” And no doubt you agreed with him.
Well, that’s not the case anymore, and it hasn’t been the case for quite a while. While the competing ethnic and religious groups in Iraq have been trying unsuccessfully to put together a democracy – at the U.S.’s bayonet point, I might add – the violence tapered off, while a reinvigorated Taliban and other nationalists have made things messy in Afghanistan. Afghanistan has been at the top of the U.S. foreign-policy discussions for several years now, and recent events suggest that the end of the U.S. involvement in Afghanistan is a long way off.
Moreover, with the U.S. gradually pulling out of Iraq and the Iraqi police being handed the reins over time, there has been a recent upswing in violence there. It remains to be seen whether the recent violence is just a momentary flare-up or whether it is just the prelude to something stronger and more protracted.
Now, I don’t have any formal training in foreign policy or on modern military strategy. I certainly don’t have access to any of the government’s intelligence that it gathers on those it perceives as its enemies in Iraq and Afghanistan. All I have access to is the same information that all of you do; the same information that CANNOT HELP but be skewed in a pro-Jewish fashion, simply because the purveyors of that information – namely, the mass news and entertainment media – are either Jews or are bought-and-paid-for front men who are told to say (and NOT say) very specific things by their Jewish employers.
But what I do have – that many White people don’t – is a worldview that helps me make sense of and interpret the events that are taking place here in the United States and elsewhere around the world. Basically, this worldview holds that the various human races are unique, distinct from each other, and that they should remain so. This worldview also holds that, from time to time, some races actively pursue the destruction of others. In particular, throughout history and up to the present day, the Jewish race is and has been consciously attacking my race – the White race – attempting to push it to extinction. The Jews today are doing this through their control of the mass media and their presence and influence in the government, business, and educational sectors of our society.
Aside from the Jews, the White racialist worldview holds that the other non-White races are contributing to the weakening of the relative strength of the White race, mostly through their disproportionately high birthrate and through the fact that they are being allowed to settle in large numbers in areas that have historically been limited to Whites. Unlike the actions of the Jews, however, which are calculated to have particular effects, the actions of other non-Whites are largely – but not entirely – unconscious. This makes the Jewish the primary enemy of the White race, if “enemy” is a term you can embrace. “Competitor” might be a more descriptive term, but choose the word that works for you.
Anyway, I should mention here that I’m not denying that my people have enforced their will upon others at various times and places. No one is contradicting that fact, and it is simply a historical truth that different races argue and name-call and yell and scream and push and shove and fight when they find themselves in close proximity.
Because everyone comes to the table with dirty hands, so to speak, some of my critics claim that the fairest thing to do would be for the various races to just simply stop all conflicts NOW, thereby putting everyone back on an equal footing. Well, my response to that notion HAS to be that, although all hands are dirty, the only dirty-handed people who are in danger of being snuffed out of existence are White people. Dirty-handed Blacks, dirty-handed Latinos, dirty-handed Asians from the Indian subcontinent, and from the Orient, and Asians of every other stripe and hue, et cetera… none of those races are, at this time, in danger of becoming extinct. In each case, their overwhelming numbers and their sole possession of a large land mass are strong insurance for the continuation of their kind. Large numbers and a racial homeland are, in fact, prerequisites for the preservation of a people, and BOTH of these factors are being targeted by the main racial competitor of the White race; that is, the Jews.
The racialist worldview, far from being merely a theoretical philosophy without its feet on the ground, is an empirical one. That is, the racialist worldview is based on observations of the natural world and observations of the various societies that men have created, including the one in which we find ourselves. Our worldview, by not denying the existence of a higher power, accepts the fact that EVIDENCE for an anthropomorphic deity is completely nonexistent, and so we put no stock in such things as so-called “divine revelation.”
To put it another way, the racialist worldview is based on hard facts: population-over-time data, biological data, observations regarding the present social and moral climate, and so on. Of course, there are certain VALUES that racialists have, too – such as that our race deserves the right to decide its own fate, rather than being subject to the whims and desires of another race, like the Jews – but there is no doubt – in my mind, at least – that our White racialist worldview is firmly backed up by the evidence that men throughout history have been able to gather about the universe and life itself.
Anyway, based on the racialist worldview and the information that has come down to us through the filter of the Jew-controlled media, it seems to me to be clear that there can be no American victory in Iraq or Afghanistan, at least not a victory as envisioned by President Obama and other heads-in-the-clouds types. I can’t conceive of Iraq or Afghanistan EVER being stable democracies, where conflict is discussed rather than fought about and where speeches and majority decisions carry more weight than blood and iron, to paraphrase the great unifier of Germany, Otto von Bismarck.
In order for a form of government to be effective, it must grow out of the temperament and traditions of its people. And, without saying anything about the temperament of the Iraqi and Afghan peoples, certainly there is no tradition of representative government in those countries. The U.S. might succeed in forcing democracy upon its holdings in the Middle East for a time, but to imagine that such a condition could last for any reasonable length of time without major distortion or disruption is the height of illusion.
But if there can’t be victory for the Bush-Obama forces in the Middle East, can there at least be glory? Glory is often attained with victory, but victory isn’t a requirement. For example, King Leonidas and his 300 Spartans who fought to the last man at the pass at Thermopylae to protect Greece from the invading Persian army in 480 B.C. attained glory without victory. Davy Crockett and the handful of Americans who fought the Mexicans and died at the Alamo attained glory without victory. The White men from every nation of Europe who fought with National Socialist Germany for a free Europe and against Communism and Jewish domination attained glory without victory. So is there glory to be gained by the U.S. military in the Middle East, even if there can be no victory?
No. To attain glory, one must be fighting for a noble cause: the preservation of one’s people, for instance. That isn’t the case with the Bush-Obama armies in Iraq and Afghanistan. And to attain glory, one must be struggling to preserve or create a way of life for oneself and his own kind, NOT trying to impose one’s own way of life on another people that isn’t interested in it. So, again, not only will there be no victory for the U.S. forces in the Middle East, but there will be no glory for those forces either.
Of course, none of this is a criticism of the brave men and women who have sacrificed their limbs and their sanity and their lives in the butcher-shop that Presidents Bush and Obama have created out of Iraq and Afghanistan. It is just a shame that a man’s government will gladly send him to die in the sand in order to make things easier for an arrogant little country that views all non-Jews as expendable animals, a country that brazenly defies the international community at every turn, particularly with regard to human rights. Perhaps that’s because the Jews don’t consider non-Jews to be human at all; so how could the Israelis be violating any of the goyim’s human rights?
Anyway, we in the National Alliance, along with other White racialists, are in pursuit of both glory AND victory. Glory, in the form of future generations knowing what we struggled for and why, the tremendous odds we faced, and the sacrifices we made. Victory, in the form of a homogeneous White racial state that is steered by a forward-thinking White government that acts and makes decisions on the basis of racialist principles.
Unlike the U.S. wars in the Middle East – which White racialists take NO credit for and that we DON’T support – THAT is something worth fighting for, and not necessarily the kind of fighting being done in Iraq and Afghanistan by our brothers and sisters who are being used by the political gangsters and shysters who have hijacked the U.S. government. Right now, we are just fighting with our words for the hearts and minds of our White kinsfolk, so that glory and victory will eventually follow.
I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.
